BlueIOT (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.
Industry news Industry news

UWB vs Bluetooth: Which Is the Better Indoor Positioning Technology?


Indoor positioning technologies are becoming increasingly important in today’s connected world. Blueiot is a leading provider of Bluetooth AoA (angle of arrival) indoor positioning technology. However, there is another technology that is gaining traction in the market - UWB (ultra-wideband). In this article, we will show you UWB vs Bluetooth and help you choose the right solution for your indoor positioning needs.


The Advantages of UWB and Bluetooth

UWB and Bluetooth are two distinct technologies, each with its own set of advantages. UWB uses short pulses of energy to measure the time it takes for a signal to travel between two devices. This results in highly precise positioning with accuracy within a few centimeters. However, UWB is more expensive and consumes more power than other technologies, making it less practical for some applications.


Bluetooth, on the other hand, is a low-power technology that is widely available and easy to use. It can be used for indoor positioning with the help of AoA algorithms, which use the angle of a signal to determine the position of a device. Bluetooth is also less expensive than UWB and requires less power, making it more practical for certain applications. The accuracy of Bluetooth positioning is generally less precise than UWB, with an accuracy range of several meters.

Choosing the Right Technology for Your Needs

When it comes to choosing the right indoor positioning solution, you should consider a few factors. First and foremost, consider the accuracy requirements of your application. If you require highly precise positioning, UWB may be the better choice. However, if your requirements are less strict, Bluetooth may be more practical and cost-effective.

Another factor to consider is the cost of the technology. UWB is generally more expensive than Bluetooth, which may make it less practical for some applications. Additionally, UWB requires more power than Bluetooth, which may be a concern in battery-powered devices.


Lastly, consider the compatibility of the technology with your existing systems. Bluetooth is a widely adopted technology that is supported by a wide range of devices, making it easy to integrate into existing systems. UWB, on the other hand, may require more specialized hardware and software, which could make it more difficult to integrate.



In conclusion, considering UWB vs Bluetooth, they are two distinct indoor positioning technologies with their own set of advantages. UWB offers highly precise positioning but is generally more expensive and requires more power. Bluetooth, on the other hand, is less expensive and requires less power but has lower positioning accuracy. When selecting the right technology for your needs, it’s important to consider the accuracy requirements, cost, and compatibility of the technology with your existing systems. Blueiot offers Bluetooth AoA indoor positioning technology that is cost-effective, easy to use, and compatible with a wide range of devices, making it a great choice for many applications. Get in touch with us today to learn more about our products and services.

Previous : No more
Previous : No more
Next : No more
Next : No more
Blueiot Recognized in the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Indoor Location Services Report
Blueiot makes its first year of recognition in the industry.