Search
Under the wave of Industry 4.0 and smart logistics, real-time positioning systems (RTLS) have become a core tool for enterprises to optimize asset management and improve operational efficiency. From equipment scheduling in manufacturing workshops to drug tracking in medical institutions, RTLS helps companies reduce search time, reduce the risk of loss and optimize space utilization by accurately locating asset locations. However, high-precision positioning technologies (such as UWB and 5G) are often accompanied by high hardware costs and deployment complexity, while low-cost solutions (such as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi) may affect application effects due to insufficient accuracy. For buyers, how to find a balance between accuracy requirements and cost budgets has become the key to the success of RTLS projects.
Precise positioning requirements: from "one size fits all" to "tiered management"
The accuracy requirements of RTLS are not the higher the better. Enterprises need to formulate differentiated positioning strategies based on asset value, usage scenarios and business goals to avoid cost waste caused by "over-positioning".
Differentiate asset priorities: Application of the 80/20 rule
Prioritize assets according to their value and importance, use high-precision positioning (≤1 meter) for core assets (such as high-value equipment and key components), and use low-precision positioning (3-5 meters) for ordinary assets (such as office supplies and low-value consumables). For example, a certain automobile manufacturer only uses UWB technology (accuracy of 10 cm) for welding robots worth more than 500,000 yuan, and uses Bluetooth AoA solution (accuracy of 1 meter) for tool carts worth less than 10,000 yuan. This grading strategy reduces overall costs by 40% while ensuring the management efficiency of key assets.
Matching scene accuracy requirements: Dynamically adjust positioning strategies
Different scenarios have significant differences in tolerance for accuracy. In the warehouse picking scenario, pickers need to quickly locate goods on the shelves. At this time, sub-meter accuracy (0.5-1 meter) can meet the needs; in the management of operating room instruments, slight misalignment of instruments may cause medical accidents, requiring millimeter-level accuracy (<10 cm). Enterprises can clarify their needs through the "scenario-accuracy matrix":
Warehousing and logistics: the picking path requires 0.5-1 meter accuracy, and inventory counting can be relaxed to 2-3 meters;
Manufacturing workshop: equipment collaboration requires 0.1-0.5 meter accuracy, and 1 meter accuracy is sufficient for material storage areas;
Medical assets: surgical instruments require <10 cm accuracy, and 1 meter accuracy is sufficient for ordinary medicines;
Open areas (parks): 5-10 meters of vehicle tracking accuracy is sufficient, and personnel positioning can be relaxed to 10-20 meters.
Balancing real-time performance and cost: the cost-effectiveness of intermittent positioning
If the business does not require high real-time performance (such as nighttime equipment inspections), "triggered positioning" can be used instead of continuous tracking. For example, UWB tags are installed on forklifts in warehouses, and positioning is activated only when entering a specific area, and the rest of the time it enters sleep mode, reducing the power consumption of tags by 80%, extending the battery life from 3 months to 2 years, and indirectly reducing maintenance costs.
Technology selection: weighing performance, cost and deployment complexity
RTLS technology routes are diverse, and buyers need to comprehensively evaluate positioning accuracy, hardware cost, deployment difficulty and ecological compatibility to avoid project failure due to wrong technology selection.
Comparison of mainstream RTLS technologies: the "impossible triangle" of accuracy and cost
UWB technology positioning accuracy can reach 10-30 cm, but the cost of a single tag is 40-120 US dollars, and dense deployment of base stations is required, with high deployment complexity; Bluetooth AoA accuracy is 30-50 cm, the tag cost is 20-80 US dollars, and the deployment complexity is medium; Wi-Fi accuracy is 2-5 meters, the tag cost is only 5-20 US dollars, and existing APs can be directly used, with the lowest deployment cost; although RFID tag cost is as low as 0.5-5 US dollars, a large number of readers (one every 10-20 meters) are required, and the deployment complexity is extremely high; 5G accuracy is 0.5-2 meters, but the cost of a single tag is 100-300 US dollars, and a 5G private network needs to be built, with huge initial investment.
Selection suggestions:
High-precision rigid-demand scenarios (such as operating room equipment management): UWB is preferred. Although the cost is high, its accuracy and reliability are irreplaceable;
Medium-precision, large-scale scenarios (such as warehouses of 10,000 square meters): Bluetooth AoA is a cost-effective choice. Its tag cost is only 1/3 of UWB, and coverage can be optimized through antenna arrays;
Low-cost, wide-coverage scenarios (such as campus vehicle management): Wi-Fi or LoRa combined with GPS hybrid positioning, using existing infrastructure to reduce deployment costs.
Fusion positioning technology: Breaking through the limitations of a single technology
A single technology is difficult to meet the needs of complex scenarios. Fusion positioning (such as UWB+inertial navigation, Bluetooth+Wi-Fi) can improve performance and reduce costs through data complementarity. For example, a logistics center uses Bluetooth AoA to locate shelves in the warehouse (accuracy of 1 meter), deploys UWB to locate packages in the sorting area (accuracy of 30 cm), and equips AGV carts with inertial navigation modules to make up for the positioning blind spots when the signal is blocked. This fusion solution reduces the overall cost by 35% compared to the full UWB solution, while improving positioning stability by 20%.
Open ecosystem and standardized protocols: reduce long-term costs
Choosing an RTLS solution that supports open protocols (such as IEEE 802.15.4z, Bluetooth 5.1) can avoid vendor lock-in and reduce subsequent expansion and maintenance costs. For example, a manufacturing company uses an RTLS platform based on Bluetooth 5.1, which can seamlessly access sensors and access control systems that support the same protocol in the future, without repeated investment in infrastructure, saving more than 500,000 yuan in hardware upgrade costs within 3 years.
Deployment strategy: from "full coverage" to "precise coverage"
The deployment scope of RTLS directly affects the cost. Enterprises need to achieve "covering key areas with minimum cost" through scenario-based planning, phased implementation and resource reuse.
Scenario-based base station layout: avoid "average effort"
Divide the area according to the asset flow path and positioning hotspots, densely deploy base stations on key paths (such as production lines and sorting channels), and reduce deployment in low-frequency areas.
Phased implementation: from pilot to scale
Verify the technical feasibility through a small-scale pilot, and then gradually expand to the entire factory.
Resource reuse: Utilize existing infrastructure
Reuse the company's existing networks (such as Wi-Fi APs, industrial Ethernet) and equipment (such as AGV carts, forklifts) as much as possible to reduce additional hardware purchases.
Long-term maintenance: from "one-time investment" to "full life cycle management"
The cost of RTLS includes not only the initial hardware and deployment costs, but also long-term expenses such as tag replacement, system upgrades and personnel training. Buyers need to reduce the total cost of ownership (TCO) by optimizing operation and maintenance strategies.
Tag battery management: Extend service life
Choose low-power tags (such as tags that support Bluetooth 5.1, which consume 60% less power than traditional tags) and extend battery life through technologies such as sleep mode and dynamic refresh rate.
System scalability: Avoid "rebuilding from scratch"
Choose a modularly designed RTLS platform that supports subsequent new functions (such as temperature and humidity monitoring, vibration detection) and device types (such as drones, robots) without replacing the entire system.
Personnel training and digital tools: reduce operation and maintenance labor costs
Through training, improve the technical capabilities of the internal team and reduce dependence on suppliers; at the same time, use digital tools (such as automated alarms and remote diagnosis) to improve operation and maintenance efficiency.
The balance between accuracy and cost of RTLS is not a technical problem, but the art of business decision-making. Buyers need to abandon the extreme thinking of "pursuing extreme accuracy" or "simply compressing costs" and instead find the "optimal solution" that suits their own business scenarios through demand classification, technology integration, precise deployment and full life cycle management.
Search 
